Happy talk: School textbooks play it safe
by HEIDI PRICE
Monday, Oct. 13, 2003 at 6:19 AM
tell children the truth
In Judy Totty's 11th-grade Advanced Placement English class, she delves into a little history.
One assignment, for example, asks her students to examine accounts written by those who witnessed history instead of just accepting what they read in history books.
"I try to teach them to go to primary sources to search for the truth themselves," said Totty, who teaches English and drama at Washington High School.
Among the books stacked on Totty's desk is Howard Zinn's "A People's History of the United States," which takes a critical look at the American story from the viewpoint of oppressed social classes, such as blacks, Native Americans and women.
"The history books are written by the winners of the war in the past," said Totty. Examining different viewpoints helps students approach not only history but learning from a different perspective, said Totty in an interview one afternoon after classes had ended.
As acting chairwoman of the English department, Totty recently led a group of teachers on a two-year expedition for a new textbook series for grades six through 12.
The search proved difficult for many reasons. The series not only had to meet state standards but also address the unique needs of students in the district. Students at Wash High are sharply divided between high achievers and below-average students, with few falling in the middle, Totty said.
"Boring, boring, boring," is how Totty described many of the textbooks the group encountered. "They were all pretty much the same, all the textbooks."
Totty's own class syllabus is heavily supplemented with books like Mark Twain's "Huckleberry Finn," which students read after their parents sign a permission form.
But she's most concerned about the effect of banal textbooks on students who don't take advanced placement or honors courses.
"I feel, especially for the slower, general student. How do they keep focused on something that's so boring?" Totty asked.
As director of curriculum and instruction in Peters Township School District, Mary Ann Battaglia said she and a 40-member committee of teachers, parents and community members search for textbooks imbued with multi-cultural references.
"We live in a homogenized kind of community. We want to make sure our children have exposure to cultural things," Battaglia said.
If a textbook falls short, teachers address those gaps or inadequacies in other ways, including with online research, multi-media tools and supplemental readings.
"Because we give teachers an array of materials, I don't look at textbooks as the be-all, end-all for any children," Battaglia said.
In "The Language Police," published earlier this year, educational historian Diane Ravitch examines the abridgment, modification and censorship of textbooks willingly undertaken by educational publishers to remove words, topics or imagery that may be offensive. The result, Ravitch found, is textbooks that sell, do not offend, but nor do they engage, either.
Educational publishers follow bias and sensitivity guidelines often as expansive as the books they publish. Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley, for example, takes books through a 161-page set of guidelines before they are published.
As a result, "heroine" is no longer an appropriate word for a school book. It's sexist. "Honey, jam, jelly or preserves" don't fit the mold of acceptable word choices, either. Their nutritional value comes into question. Men can't be portrayed as attorneys or plumbers; that is considered stereotyping. It's taboo to show a women more concerned with a family and home, instead of a career. People of color cannot be shown living in poor, urban areas. Nor, can they be angry about it.
Stories about mice, according to one set of guidelines, upset children.
Ravitch, assistant secretary in charge of research in the U.S. Department of Education under former President Bush, first began researching the subject after being asked by President Clinton to develop a national reading test for fourth-grade students.
In developing the test, Ravitch encountered guidelines for tests as extensive as those she later found in publishing.
For example, students who live in warmer regions shouldn't be subjected to test passages about blizzards because that constitutes regional bias.
Britnee McCandless, a student in Totty's AP English class, recently took the Pennsylvania assessment in reading, said she encountered generic reading passages on the test.
"It's insulting when you get the test, how mindless some of it was," McCandless said.
Too often, people aren't aware bias and sensitivity reviews even take place, said Ravitch in a recent phone interview.
"This type of review has been turning textbooks into watery mush, all the bite and controversy taken out of them," Ravitch said. "They know something is missing, but they don't know where it is. You can't see the censorship. The censorship is what's not there."
Instead, children are being fed "happy talk" books, which they put down to watch television, go to movies or play video games.
"We're censoring the good stuff while the bad stuff is flourishing," Ravitch said. "I do think there's something to be said with grappling with the reality of evil and doing this through literature and history and not pretending it doesn't exist."
To combat censorship, Ravitch calls for better-educated teachers, ones who will discard bland textbooks in favor of histories, biographies and original-source documents.
Dr. James Longo, chairman of the education department at Washington & Jefferson College, said this is the mindset he tries to instill in students studying to be teachers: Approach every textbook critically. "They need to figure out what is the bias of this textbook because every textbook is going to have a bias," Longo said.
Longo said the bias stems from a problem also addressed in Ravitch's book - statewide textbook adoptions.
Pennsylvania does not have a statewide adoption process, nor does the commonwealth issue guidelines on bias or sensitivity, according to Shawna McClintock of the state Department of Education.
But Pennsylvania students suffer from the statewide adoption process. California and Texas are among about two dozen states that adopt textbooks on a statewide basis. Educational publishers try to create a product that appeals to both states, which make up a huge portion of the market. To do so, they must placate a more conservative mindset in Texas and a class-conscious, more liberal approach in California.
"The way they approach things is going to be noncontroversial," Longo said. "The results is a lot of textbooks are dumbed down. They're written by committees."
In the end, Totty and other teachers in the Wash High English Department recommended a series published by Prentice Hall. District superintendent Roberta DiLorenzo reviewed the series, and it was approved by the school board.
Totty said the series was well-researched, and Prentice Hall also offered more than 300 novels like "Tuck Everlasting," "Catcher in the Rye" and "Huckleberry Finn." The mix of middle school and high school literature will allow teachers to supplement anthologies at every grade level. "Kids love it. They love reading "The Scarlet Letter" or "The Crucible" or "Romeo and Juliet" because it's exciting and so much happens. It's like real life, and they know people like those characters," Totty said.
Totty argues that stories like "Huckleberry Finn" need to be on high school reading lists when it's age-appropriate for children to read it. The novel has an extensive history of being challenged by schools and libraries for its portrayal of blacks and its use of the word "nigger."
"You don't want to forget about the Holocaust in World War II. You don't want to forget about slavery in the United States or Japanese internment camps or genocide of the Indians when the explorers first came over," Totty said. "I think you have to tell children the truth."
www.observer-reporter.com/281599785489044.bsp
scarlett letter
by brian
Tuesday, Oct. 14, 2003 at 9:07 AM
kids enjoy reading the scarlet letter? did she ever pay attention to her students? I liked this lady untill I read that comment. That was the biggest piece of shit I was ever forced to read and I recall my English class agreeing.
it does have value
by noah
Tuesday, Oct. 14, 2003 at 12:24 PM
i don't like the book much myself but it does have value. not only in seeing the oppression of women who committed adultry but to adultry laws and it is considered one of the great american books just like "catcher in the rye"
scarlet letter
by Brian
Tuesday, Oct. 14, 2003 at 8:22 PM
catcher in the rye = amazing book
scarlett letter = huge piece of shit
scarlett letter
by erin
Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2003 at 6:53 AM
thats just sillyness, you're not going to like someone just because she had a group of kids who had a good expierience with a book you dislike?
what sense does that make?
last year my 11th grade english class read the scarlett letter, and myself among other students, ENJOYED the book. It may not be something I would have choose to read on my own, but i still enjoyed it.
Dismissing someone based on the fact that they have a different opinion on a book than you is digustingly highschool...
Lets be honest
by C.U. Student
Monday, Oct. 27, 2003 at 4:48 PM
Okay, let's just be straightforward and honest about this topic....public education is often extremely watered down and boring, and I think most people who have been through it know that whether they are willing to admit it or not. I just wanted to say that I am glad to hear about some educators admitting it and trying to do something about it. (I can only hope that the people who write/co-write/edit the available textbooks will begin to realize it, as well) I'm currently a college graduate student in the area of English and I always find it disturbing that a lot of the things I read about progressive pedagogy (at least, as it relates to English and Composition classes) are things I never saw in a classroom setting during my years of primary and secondary public education.
However, some other issues have come up in this little "discussion," if I may call it such. The issues of PC-ness and taste. Quite honestly, there is no way to keep texts from being offensive at some point without "watering them down" to the point of boring nearly-pointless junk, and we all need to face that fact. History and literature are simply NOT 100% PC and there is no way to portray them as such without substantial watering down. (Which I, personally, would argue negates a lot of their value.) However, do we really need to shelter primary and secondary students this much? Personally, I think not. After all, they are going to have to face the harsh realities of the world at some point. I'm not saying we should be all-inclusive and not shelter them at all; I'm simply saying we need to find a happy medium, somewhere between overloading them with texts that show all the evils of the world and texts that are just too 'fluffy-happy-utopia' and PC to be taken seriously.
As to the issue of taste....well, yes, that's something teachers always have to deal with and always will. People have different tastes in everything, from music to literature to sexuality, if I may draw out the comparison. You can't make everyone happy even most of the time, so you just have to do your best. I'm sure a lot of teachers would agree with me on this.
Finally, I'd like to say that we also need to remember that many times those students who are labeled 'remedial' or just generally placed in a lower bracket as far as any kind of tracking goes tend to read texts and attend classes that are even more significanly watered down than other students. If AP students are bored by classes watered down at that level, can we really wonder why students in lower level classes tend to become extremely resistant to education in general? They are constantly reminded that they are "not as smart" as their peers and are given busywork assignments designed more to keep them out of trouble than to engage them in the class. Okay, honestly I could say a lot more, but I feel that I've said enough for now. To anyone who is really interested in the issues at hand here, I would recommend reading some of Paulo Freire's work on pedagogy.
Yes, let's.
by BraveNewWorldOrderFighter
Monday, Oct. 27, 2003 at 6:41 PM
History is written by the winners. In the case of the U.S.A., the winners were certain white male landowners--often referred to as the fathers of our country, fine men all--and the bankers (The bankers, who not coincidentally own most of the world's gold, always win, no matter which political side wins, because they invest in both.).
The "watered-down and boring" history we all learned in school is designed to be that way. It ensures that people remain ignorant about and unquestioning of authority. Authority has always been in the hands of the people with the gold--the bankers.
Look at your paper money--it says "Federal Reserve Note." It is fiat money--we are all forced by law to accept it and nothing else as "legal tender."
Our "legal tender" money is not printed or created by the United States Government. It is printed and created--out of nothing except declaration--by the Federal Reserve, a private bank, which lends it to the U.S. Government--you and I, the taxpayers. The bankers of the Federal Reserve collect principal and interest on their investment of nothing at all. The bankers literally control the economy.
The truth has been hidden, in plain sight, all of our lives. Novus Ordo Seclorum, found on the back of every single dollar bill under that all-seeing eye, translates as New Order of the Ages. New World Order.
What you don't know CAN hurt you. What's coming is going to hurt all of us--except the bankers, who will laugh all the way to the bank.
Remember the Golden Rule: He who has the gold, rules.
Leftist ignorance is the New World Order
by truthteller
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 9:37 AM
Changing the subject a little, but certainly by no means not very much, what of math books that teach children how to hug a tree? How about Leftist degenerates
pushing the homosexual Agenda?
Priorities
by Matt
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 10:32 AM
Not to generalize, but anyone who is more worried about a homosexual agenda than providing people of all backgrounds with an equal education should seriously reexamine his or her priorities when it comes to education. It bothers me that social immobility in the United States begins in our schools, yet the religious right seems more concerned with fighting the fictitious "homosexual agenda" than with improving educational opportunities. Maybe if billions of dollars hadn't gone to Iraq for nothing, more could have been spent funding education, thus resulting in smaller classes and better opportunities for young people? Maybe if our government hadn't spent TWENTY-EIGHT MILLION DOLLARS ADVERTISING THE NEW TWENTY DOLLAR BILL, twenty new schools could have been built in our largest cities. . . but dammit if that gay agenda aren't the problem with our education system!
fiction?
by truthteller
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 10:42 AM
You're obviously blind.
Please put "GLSEN" in a search and you'll see. But of course some Leftist who only seems to fixate on our "illegal" war, the UN, Halliburton, etc, won't admit that there's a true homosexual Agenda.
By the way, have you ever used the Orwellian word "heterosexist", an INVENTED word that the Borg Collective uses?
I'll help you along in your Education
by required
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 10:51 AM
One need only see the propaganda evident by the number of times "homophobia" and "heterosexist" is used.
Both are invented words, you might understand, if you're educated.
For millions of years heterosexuals are the only humans to propagate the species. Whether you whining Borg want life to be fair makes no difference. Life itself is biased against Perverts.
http://www.glsen-sfeb.org/whatis.html
Truth about education
by C.U. Student
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 10:58 AM
truthteller...I'm sorry to have to be the one to point it out, but for someone accusing someone else of "fixating" on the war and so on, you certainly seem to be "fixated" on issues regarding homosexuality. Oh, and by the way, the term "heterosexist" has already become a common term in academic discourse, particularly in any research related to language-gender-sexuality connections, so I don't really see why it is worth squabbling over in this particular discussion.
Matt...thank you for trying to pull the line of the discussion back to the subject of education. This is one of my personal concerns, and I'm glad some people are willing to look honestly at the fact that our country IS squandering money that would be better spent on education. There are young people graduating high schools with little or no reading and writing skills (those that actually manage to graduate, that is), and we're more worried about things going on half way across the world. Personally, that makes me want to scream.
Oh, and as I said before, for anyone who is seriously interested in the American education system and problems with socio-economic mobility, check out some of Paulo Freire's work on the education system and progressive pedagogy.
reading, writing, and rectum ripping
by truthteller
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 11:38 AM
Somebody, please tell me there's no hidden Agenda here:
http://www.glsen-sfeb.org/whatis.html
MISSION
GLSEN SF-EB strives to assure that each member of every school community is valued and respected, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity/expression.
CORE VALUES
An atmosphere of respect engenders a positive sense of self, which is the basis of educational achievement and personal growth.
Homophobia and heterosexism undermine a healthy school climate.
Forces such as racism and sexism have similarly adverse impacts on communities.
Any individual regardless of sexual orientation or occupation, who is committed to seeing our mission realized in schools from preschool to college is welcome.
GOALS
To educate teachers, students administrators and the public at large about the damaging effects homophobia and heterosexism have on youth and adults alike�.
---------------------------
I'm straight. Isn't MY gender identity and expression valued? Then WHY is there the obviously antagonistic and provocative invented term "heterosexist" used, and more than once?
Are "homosexism" and "homosexist" and "heterophobia" not equally valid terms?
Why do these people feel the need to go into the schools and indoctrinate young and malleable minds? Kids are always in the process of finding themselves. Adults who go in and push an Agenda is dangerous. And those Degenerates are going into elementary schools forcing their garbage down the throats of children who aren't able to speak for themselves. Where's the save haven for straights nowadays?
Do I have a right to go in and manipulate the minds of YOUR impressionable children? If I like purple haired women with only one butt cheek, why can't I walk into any school anywhere and sing the joys of what makes me orgasm? Or maybe I'm an arsonist, a lowlife ELF freak, who masturbates to my handiwork. Do I have your approval to go into the elementary schools today and force my twisted Leftist sicko ideology on impressionable minds? After all, to a sick and twisted Leftist, setting fires is "normal".
chilling stupidity
by truthteller
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 11:45 AM
"Oh, and by the way, the term "heterosexist" has already become a common term in academic discourse, particularly in any research related to language-gender-sexuality connections, so I don't really see why it is worth squabbling over in this particular discussion."
If anyone feels uncertain whether you're a pathetic member of the Borg Collective, they need read no further than that absolutely moronic statement. It's bereft of any independent thought.
Programmed idiots like you are what Hitler found so useful. Congratulate yourself.
I never thought in my lifetime I'd have the opportunity to converse with a resurrected Brown Shirt....
Please don't twist the truth
by C.U. Student
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 11:46 AM
truthteller....please don't try to pretend you don't have a personal agenda here in discrediting anyone that advocates a slightly leftist stance by equating them with advocates of homosexuality automatically and then discrediting homosexual affiliated education groups....obviously you want to discredit the sight you posted and quoted from since you quoted only partially and skipped the line, "To support schools in redressing ALL inequities based on race, sex, class, etc." Why is trying to keep harassment out of our public school system so troubling to you?
My concern too
by Matt
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 11:49 AM
It is one of my personal concerns, too.
My college alma mater hiked tuition 14% over the past two years since I've graduated. More and more, not only at the high school level, but at the college level, students from poor backgrounds are finding it more difficult to afford the top quality education available to those from wealthier families. This is further stratifying the country. Many people believe that a economically polarized society breeds violence. Could this be evidenced by America's ridiculously high homicide rate? I don't presume to say that there is a direct causal connection between the two, but it is at least worth noting.
Also worth noting was the lack of concern given to education during the Democratic candidates' debates a couple of nights ago.
In respect to Orwell, he was writing in a time where Communism was the greatest fear facing English society, and I highly doubt that he would have opposed greater unbiased educational opportunities for anyone, be they prole, the outer circle, or the inner circle. In fact, in "1984" the inner circle is allowed to maintain control over the lowest class (the prole, making up 85% of the population) by limiting the education they are allowed to obtain.
of things Brown
by truthteller
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 11:51 AM
You selectively ignored what I said about their being provocative and antagonistic. So don't expect to win an argument using twisted shit that they "care". It's a lie and you know it.
Tell me, little bunghole chaser, about the obvious ostracism a straight will find on those "Day of Silences". And tell us why there even needs to be such a day.
Heil Shincter!
i
by i
Thursday, Nov. 06, 2003 at 5:12 PM
"...obviously you want to discredit the sight you posted and quoted from"
That's 'site', pay more attention to your studies and it might get you somewhere.
i sorry
by i
Friday, Nov. 07, 2003 at 1:37 AM
i'm just a little bitter since i got busted cruising in North Park. Damn investigative journalism
i
by i
Friday, Nov. 07, 2003 at 5:20 AM
"i'm just a little bitter since i got busted cruising in North Park. "
I'm not from Pgh but it sounds like you're familiar with this 'inside joke'. Why do you cruise North Park?
pointless
by C.U. Student
Saturday, Nov. 08, 2003 at 9:40 AM
I'd just like to say that I would really like to continue the conversation started here, but as I will not respond to name-calling, I'll just stop posting after this. I'm just rather tired of all conversations degenerating into name-calling sessions, and I personally will not engage in them once they truely reach that point.
say goodbye, please
by truthteller
Saturday, Nov. 08, 2003 at 10:40 AM
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
Society doesn't need Apologists for perversity. Take your mumbo-jumbo about education elsewhere.
School means the 3 R's, not "Womyn's Studies" and "How to Hate White Males" and "Tree Hugging 101" and "How to be Faddish and Chase Bungholes and Feel Safe".
Whether you like it or not, lamentations about the state of education today includes the absolute idiocy of the very existence of these Marxist sicko philosophies. The educational system needs to be razed and rebuilt from the ground up.
No
by Pete
Saturday, Nov. 08, 2003 at 2:43 PM
Society doesn't need hate-mongerers
What society does need, however, is for a subjective "Unless the motherfucker deserves it" clause to be added to existing assault and battery laws. I'd love to stand up in court and say something along the lines of "But your honor, just talk to the little shithead for five minutes, and see if you can keep from taking a gavel to his testicles."
I think that the majority of people like yourself who profess hatred of gays sit in front of your computer and try to find pictures of 11 year old boys to masturbate too, and then, upon completion of the task, inform us all of the eeeeevils of gay rights. You are not unlike Roy Cohn, the famous prosecutor of the Rosenbergs, and also a homophobic anti-semite, who turned out to be a gay Jew. Go figure.
projection
by truthteller
Saturday, Nov. 08, 2003 at 3:37 PM
Why don't you cry "McCarthyism" next, you little pecker chaser?
"Stop the Hate" is a worn out phrase from you hypocritical fruits who idolize Che and Lenin and Marx ad nauseum. You pieces of shit celebrate mass murderers and want Anarchy and can't stand it when it's handed to you, when someone throws anarchy right back in your faces. You project your Evil on those who speak out against it.
As a conservative Anarchist, I reject your Degeneracy and Child Predation. The day will come when I'll meet you in the streets, and people like me will always win against those who hate Life.
Try harder, Little Precious.