community-based, non-corporate, participatory media

About Contact Us Policies Mailing Lists Radio Video Search

View article without comments

Anal Sex Byproduct Named for Senator Santorum
by uma om Thursday, Dec. 11, 2003 at 6:44 PM

Lube-and-fecal matter mix takes name of anti-gay U.S. Senator.

Anal Sex Byproduct Named for Senator Santorum

Internationally syndicated sex columnist, Dan Savage has launched a sweeping campaign to introduce a new word, "santorum," into the English language. Mr. Savage defines "santorum," which is named for U.S. Senator, Rick Santorum as "The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex."

Mr. Savage's column, "Savage Love" appears in over seventy newspapers in the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia. His effort to introduce "santorum" into popular parlance comes in response to a series of bigoted remarks made by Senator Santorum in reference to homosexuals. To help popularize the new word, the columnist has launched a website, http://www.spreadingsantorum.com, which includes a comprehensive selection of santorum-related letters, songs, merchandise, pictures, fun facts and recipes.

The new word is spreading fast. In addition to entries in the Urban Dictionary and the Glossary of Perversion, the site boasts numerous testimonials from readers who report hearing it used in countries as diverse as Cuba, Belgium and China. Google currently ranks http://www.spreadingsantorum.com as the fourth most relevant site corresponding to a search for "santorum."

Mr. Savage says that matching a credible-sounding name with a gap in the English language was the key to the santorum campaign's success.

"What works so well about santorum is that a smart Savage Love reader linked Senator Santorum's vaguely clinical-sounding name with something distinctly scatological, an anal-sex-induced bodily fluid that had previously lacked a really good name. 'Santorum' sounds like it could be what that frothy mix of lube and fecal matter has always been called, and that's why it's caught on."

The santorum crusade began in April, 2003 when the Pennsylvanian senator told reporters from the Associated Press that he hoped the United States Supreme Court would uphold anti-gay sodomy laws and compared consensual gay sex to incest, bigamy, adultery, and "man-on-dog" sex. The comments inspired a suggestion from a Savage Love reader that a sex act be named for Santorum "so that the episode would never be forgotten."

In response, Mr. Savage solicited readers' suggestions for a worthy "santorum" definition. More than 3000 nominations poured in. Nine made it to a shortlist. Readers voted overwhelmingly for "The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex." The rest is history.

Although Senator Santorum is generally despised by Savage's readership, a few fans have challenged the fairness of forever linking him (and, by proxy, his family or anyone unlucky enough to share his name) to the previously anonymous "frothy mixture." But Savage is unapologetic.

"I understand that there are some innocent Santorums out there. But I see it like this: It sure sucked to be Fred and Ethel Hitler of Columbus, Ohio, back in 1943, didn't it? Or Bill Himmler? Or a Quisling in Norway after the war? Or a no-relation Lewinsky? Or an Oswald in 1963? Or Mary Sue bin Laden in upstate New York in 2001? My point is, sometimes a perfectly good name is stolen from a family, sometimes it's ruined in fact, by the actions of one bad, wayward, idiotic, or downright evil person, and it's the bad, wayward, idiotic, or evil person who shared your name that's to blame, not the general public."

Senator Santorum has declined to comment on the new homonym for his last name. But he may have trouble avoiding the matter forever.

In addition to encouraging readers to post links to the Spreading Santorum website and lobby for an entry in the Oxford English Dictionary, Mr. Savage has offered a gift pack including a case of lube, a selection of santorum-themed T-shirts and copies of Anal Pleasure & Health and The Big Book of Masturbation to anyone who can get a quote from Santorum (the senator) on santorum (the lube-and-fecal-matter mix).

"Let's keep spreading the word," Savage says. "Soon santorum will be on everyone's lips."

--30--

add your comments


Good ol' Dan Savage
by Hagbard Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 9:05 AM

Best. Sex columnist. Ever.

add your comments


Oh, please...
by Hagbard Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 9:38 AM

Straight guys don't have adolescent fetishes?

add your comments


response to guy
by mary Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 11:54 AM
mary@indypgh.org

how about, people shouldn't be "done away with"?

add your comments


how about
by straight guy Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 1:01 PM

Then what do we do with them? They are a danger to society.

Do you think that Dan Sewage has any redeeming social value whatsoever?

He's nothing but a lowlife scumbag, who appeals to other lowlifes who thinks that shock value and utter debasement has a place in the world.

There comes a time when society has to grow up and see the cancer on civilization.

add your comments


Get real.
by Hagbard Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 1:24 PM

The kind of stuff you see in straight pornography is *far* more debased than anything Dan Savage has ever imagined.

add your comments


the problem with guy's argument
by mary Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 1:55 PM
mary@indypgh.org

is, of course, who makes the decisions...

following guy's line of reasoning, someone with a more highly evoved moral sense than guy's (or someone who thinks they do) can just say, guy's gotta go.

add your comments


highly evolved moral sense
by straight guy Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 2:32 PM

Using your line of reasoning, that one doesn't have the right to decide over another, is it okay if I have sex with your 12 year old daughter? And don't give me any argument that it's illegal or socially unacceptable.

Can I have sex with your 12 year old daughter - yes or no?

add your comments


The difference
by Joseph Malik Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 3:05 PM

A sexual relationship between a 12-year-old and an adult is inherently coercive.

add your comments


inherently coercive
by straight guy Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 4:06 PM

Then why is GLSEN allowed in elementary schools? Explain the coercive "day of silence", please.

add your comments


Why wouldn't GLSEN be allowed?
by Hagbard Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 4:56 PM

How is having GLSEN in schools (which students can opt out of with parental permission) equivalent to an adult having sex with a 12-year-old?

Children are socialized to respect the wishes of adults. They're taught to trust them. And, of course, adults have the ability to intimidate children. That's why a relationship between an adult and a 12-year-old is inherently coercive.

How does that kind of a relationship relate in any way to GLSEN?

add your comments


guy's original suggestion
by mary Sunday, Dec. 14, 2003 at 7:15 PM
mary@indypgh.org

was that we "get rid of" folks.

Rape (which is what sex with 12-year-olds is) is illegal. It certainly doesn't follow that if we don't "get rid of" someone someone who likes the idea of sex with 12-year-olds that we are required to allow sex with 12-year-olds.

Also, you've made what might be called the Santorum error in equating sex between consenting adults (legal) and sex with children (illegal).

Finally, there is nothing "coercive" about the Day of Silence. You are not required to participate. In the unlikely event that your high school administration is so supportive of GLBT students that straight students really are made to feel uncomfortable, then you can talk with them (andminstration) and share your concerns. If it's just that you are made uncomfortable by people who are different from you- well, life probably is going to be difficult for you, and I wonder who taught you that differences per se are wrong.

add your comments


What Shall We Call Kaposis Sarcomas..
by Prodigal Yunzer Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 at 7:13 AM

That appear on one's tongue? BLUMENTHALS! Sindy Blumenthal deserves such notoriety.

add your comments


What Shall We Call Kaposis Sarcomas..
by Prodigal Yunzer Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 at 7:14 AM

That appear on one's tongue? BLUMENTHALS! Sindy Blumenthal deserves such notoriety.

add your comments


What Shall We Call Kaposis Sarcomas..
by Prodigal Yunzer Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 at 7:15 AM

That appear on one's tongue? BLUMENTHALS! Sindy Blumenthal deserves such notoriety.

add your comments


Better one for Santorum
by Gabe's Ghost Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 at 8:54 AM

A better one for Santorum would be some reference to the creepy Victorian dead baby fetish he and his proper, submissive wife exhibited when they illegally smuggled their hideously deformed stillborn child to bring it home to meet and greet their living children, then wrote a book about it.

add your comments


creepy
by creepy Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 at 10:01 AM

queers are creepy. it's creepy that people have weird fetishes about assholes and deadly diseases.

add your comments


real creepy
by 12 beers (case for short) Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 at 10:13 AM

What is real creepy is a public emergency medical service (EMS) that is privatized! Call Pittsburgh City Council today. If you have medical insurance and are rich then it might not matter but if you are poor or have a job with no medical insurance you might want to make sure that our EMS stays PUBLIC and not owned by UPMC, West Penn Allegheny and Mercy Health Care. City council phone numbers are listed in a seperate post on PGH Indy Media. Oh yea, fuck santorum.

add your comments


Dear Case
by 2Beers Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 at 2:42 PM

Apply the logic of the left I think you are lying and using deception to try to get people to believe that you are 2Beers. This war or at least protest. And what will they do if they realize that you were really more beers than 2Beers? How are you going to explain that to them.

Hey I am just trying to avoid a problem here. At least I didn't go off on a rant about some dishonest person stealing my nom de plume (or guerre).

Accept no imitations. INSIST ON THE TRUE BEERS !! INSIST ON 2BEERS !!

add your comments


The New Originals
by Lovely Lad Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 at 3:49 PM

But 2beers is just 2balls. So unless case has a dozen testes in an egg carton, you haven't much to go on.

add your comments


But
by Walt Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2003 at 4:52 PM

Since when is 12 beers a case?

Drink Carlsburg Beer, not only is it tasty, but they donate money from every sale to reading programs to underprivileged Danish childrens' reading programs. I don't know if Denmark is an impoverished country, but I thought this was very nice, and at 22 bucks a case. . . wait a second, I could have 2 cases of Natty for that. Screw the children, Natty rules!

add your comments


My Objections to SpreadinSantorum
by Arty Ploomer Friday, Mar. 05, 2004 at 10:34 AM

I have been engaging in (and winning) an ongoing debate with Daniel Savage over the ethics of his campaign. You can see a couple of my letters, and the one I sent to Sen. Santorum on Daniel Savage's site.

You can see my most recent rebuttal at

http://redwhiteandright.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_redwhiteandright_archive.html#107832527122669493

add your comments


the web site of Dan Sewage
by Irving Saturday, Mar. 06, 2004 at 8:16 AM

Here's what you find at the entrance of Dan Sewage's personal attack site on a white heterosexual. (This doesn't have an actually working link - for illustration only)

add your comments


Breaking News!
by Jim Bob Monday, Mar. 08, 2004 at 2:59 PM

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/mrbergis.html

I have located Irving and have been in contact with him: go here for the conversations.

add your comments


© 2001-2009 Pittsburgh Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not endorsed by the Pittsburgh Independent Media Center.
Disclaimer | Privacy